The Super Foolproof Volcanoclast Guide to Identifying Almost Every Mystery Rock Wthout Ever Actually Looking at it

February 10, 2012 in Post

One of my absolute favorite parts about teaching geology is when people bring me mystery rocks/minerals to identify. Not only do I love rocks, but this shows me that others care about what I do, even if they don’t have a lot of experience with geology. Sometimes these are students from my classes, but occasionally other faculty members or even people from the community will stop by looking for answers. I have noticed, as perhaps many of you have as well, that MOST of these rocks are fairly common. Ok, I guess “most” of anything is by definition “common”, but that’s beside the point. I’m just saying that these found specimens are rarely Archaean komatiites or hunks of primitive mantle. To save time, I’ve developed a foolproof system that promises to help you to identify virtually all of these mystery rocks/minerals without ever actually looking at them.

The Super Foolproof Volcanoclast Guide to Identifying Almost Every Mystery Rock/Mineral Without Ever Actually Looking at them.

Step 1: Tell them it’s quartz. I don’t care what it looks like or where they found it. Tell them it’s quartz and you will be right 95%* of the time. Is it white? Quartz. Is it light gray? Quartz. Is it milky colored? Quartz. Do they think it’s a diamond? Quartz. We could probably stop right here and call this the It’s-Always-Quartz-No-Matter-What-Guide.

Step 2: If they think it’s a meteorite, it’s slag (byproduct of iron smelting). Again, you don’t have to look at it to be 98% sure. There’s a reason most meteorites are found in Antarctica and not in a pile of other rocks. In northeastern PA, where I work, I get at least one piece of slag a year and people are SOOOOOOO disappointed when I give them the bad news. Next time, I’m telling them it’s Kryptonite. Once in a lifetime it might actually be a meteorite, in which case you simply tell them it’s slag and that you’d be happy to dispose of it for them.

Step 3: If they think it’s gold, it’s pyrite (obviously). Now this seems like a no brainer seeing as pyrite is also known as fools gold, but you’d be surprised how often people fight you on this. If they don’t believe you, suggest they try to bite it in half, then watch in horror as they actually try to do it. PLEASE DON’T EVER BITE ANY ROCK OR MINERAL ESPECIALLY IF YOU THINK IT’S GOLD. IT ISN’T. IT WILL BREAK YOUR TEETH!!!

Step 4: They say they found a gray rock in a river. In this case, give them a detailed explanation of the importance of texture in identifying rocks and how rivers tend to wear away this helpful information, so there really are a number of things it could be and it’s a little difficult to say for sure without doing more testing, but if they really want to know, you could borrow the rock and get back to them and with any luck, they stopped listening several minutes ago or even fell asleep at which point you can make your escape. The key is to never EVER admit that you don’t know what it is under any circumstances. Its a good lesson for the kids.

Step 5: They say they found a fossil. This one is easy. Pterodactyl. Always Pterodactyl. If they aren’t buying it, just say it’s a plant fragment, which, let’s face it, 99.9% of all fossils are.

Step 6: It’s got a bunch of different “stuff” in it. Now, you geologists out there are screaming “it’s conglomerate!” and maybe it is, but it’s just as likely to be a broken piece of urbanite (that’s concrete for those who didn’t get my clever joke). Concrete is often mistaken for conglomerate and for good reason. They’re both made of poorly sorted sediment, cemented together into solid pieces that are resistant to weathering. Its still fun to watch students debate the depositional environment of a piece of concrete, mostly because that used to be me.

Step 7: They think it’s amber. It’s not. It’s glass. Now this one, I have a little experience with. I got a a call from someone claiming to have “found” a 30 pound piece of amber, which would make it perhaps the largest piece of amber ever “found”. I asked where they “found” it and they answered “New Jersey”, otherwise known as the “Amber Capital of the World”. This person clearly needed to be let down easy, so I agreed to take a look at what turned out to be a giant hunk of broken glass. I tried to get more info on its provenance, but they were cagey on the details. Sometimes, it’s best not to pry.

So, there you have it. A foolproof guide to identifying virtually any mystery rock someone might throw at you (The mystery is being thrown, not the rock). If you do happen to have an Archaen komatiite, stop on by and let’s take a look. Just don’t be surprised if I say it’s quartz.

* I plan on making up these percentages for the duration of the post, so please don’t try adding them up. They will not add up to 100%. I promise.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

And the winner of the super terrific Accretionary Wedge #42 geologic prize pack is…

February 1, 2012 in Fieldwork

Maitri’s entry was chosen at random from all of the Accretionary Wedge #42 entries and will receive the prize pack consisting of a volcanic bomb, a piece of mantle peridotite, ash from the 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens, ash from the 640 ka eruption of Yellowstone, a rough diamond cube, a piece of Pennsylvania anthracite, and a spectacular piece of garnet amphiboolite.  Congratulations!  Also, thank you to all who sent in entries, which are all listed below.  This was a lot of fun and we all got to see some very interesting geology right under our coffee makers and blenders.  My own entry will be posted soon.

Accretionary Wedge #42 Entries

http://gioscience.blogspot.com/2012/01/accretionary-wedge-42-countertop.html

http://earthscienceguy.posterous.com/accretionary-wedge-42-countertop-geology-deco

http://www.sandatlas.org/2012/01/houses-built-from-diamonds-and-impact-breccia/

http://bnselim.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/accretionary-wedge-42-rocky-eggs/

http://earth-likeplanet.blogspot.com/2012/01/accretionary-wedge-42-counter-top.html

http://all-geo.org/metageologist/2012/01/granite-and-green-shoes-aw-42/

http://blogs.agu.org/magmacumlaude/2012/01/25/rocks-in-the-kitchen-accretionary-wedge-42-entry/

http://earth-likeplanet.blogspot.com/2012/01/accretionary-wedge-42-counter-top.html

http://hypocentral.com/blog/2012/01/30/accretionary-wedge-42-countertop-geology/

http://geotripper.blogspot.com/2012/01/accretionary-wedge-42-countertop.html

http://blogs.agu.org/georneys/2012/01/25/accretionary-wedge-42-countertop-geology/

http://offtheshelfedge.wordpress.com/2012/01/30/accretionary-wedge-42-countertop-geology-palacio-de-carlos-v-conglomerate/

http://plantsandrocks.blogspot.com/2012/01/little-bone-house-on-prairie.html

http://vatul.net/blog/index.php/6547

http://annsmusingsongeologyotherthings.blogspot.com/2012/01/accretionary-wedge-42-countertop.html

http://www.flickr.com/photos/67507070@N00/5976170129/

http://poikiloblastic.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/accretionary-wedge-42-countertop-geology-of-two-marbles/

http://bnselim.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/accretionary-wedge-42-rocky-eggs/

I also posted some entries here and here.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

“Fair Use” is defined by the law, not by publishers

January 26, 2012 in Opinion

A discussion thread has recently opened up in response to short article by Simon Wellings of metageologist who wrote about how various publishers allow (or forbid) you to use their copyrighted material in a news story or blog post.  Brian Romans added to this discussion a few days later and the Geological Society of America sent out a tweet reminding everyone of their policy regarding reprinting of copyrighted material.

While I think the GSA policy is fair in the sense that they permit you to use enough of the copyrighted material to write a decent news story or blog post, an important point has been lost entirely: “Fair Use” is defined by the law, not by publishers.

It’s nice that the GSA permits the use of a “single figure, a brief paragraph, or a single table from a GSA publication” without permission, however that’s not their decision to make.  U.S. copyright Law is codified in Title 17 of the United States Code and the doctrine of “fair use” is described in section 107 of the Copyright Law.  The government even provides this useful summary of “fair use”.  Reprinted here (with attribution, of course) is the relevant section.

 

“Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:

    1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
    2. The nature of the copyrighted work
    3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
    4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work

The distinction between fair use and infringement may be unclear and not easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission. Acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining permission.” (emphasis mine)

 

So there you have it.  The use of a single figure for teaching might be considered “fair”, while the production of that same figure on a t-shirt sold for profit may be deemed by the court to violate the publishers copyright.  However, nowhere in the above definition does it say that “fair use” is dependent on the policy of the content owner.  If the GSA or any other publisher wants to define “fair use” as one figure or ten, they are welcome to, however it’s ultimately up to the courts to decide whether a specific use is “fair” or not.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Accretionary Wedge #42…or Why I’ve Loved Rocks Since Before I Could Walk

January 25, 2012 in Accretionary Wedge

This Accretionary Wedge entry comes from Viva and is exactly what I was hoping for.  What a great story.  Thanks!  Remember, you only have until the end of the month to get your entry in if you want to be entered for the special geologic prize pack.

 

This is a love story about an end table.

It sits in my maternal Grandma’s living room in Colorado, and it has since before I was born.  I learned to walk by pulling myself up on it, and cruising round and round and looking at the ‘pretties’.  As I got older, I would spend hours examining it, and trying to figure out where the rocks came from and how they were formed.

5 years ago while cleaning out my Paternal Grandma’s basement in Oregon I found an almost exact twin buried in the back room!

Larger versions and close-ups of slices uploaded here, as well as my ‘runner up’ items -  http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v201/brennatidwell/Accretionary%20Wedge%2042/

The table was in pretty rough shape when I found it.. moved about the country several times, and exposed to the weather.  I refinished the legs (original 60′s blond wood. yuk) none of them match now, as they are all different woods. (stamped JAPAN on the ends).  The top has some condition issues, as you can see in the close-ups, scratches and bubbles where the ‘plastic’? has separated from some areas, but it’s still solid.

Now when my 5 yr old grandson comes over, this is his favorite place to play.  :)

These tables were created by Leonard Rhodeman near Amherst Colorado sometime in the 60′s.  He was a farmer and this was his hobby, so near as we can figure there should be no more than 20-30 in existence.  He would ‘go up to the mountains’ and collect the rocks, bring them home and slice them up.  Everyone around there usually headed ‘up the mountains’ by way of Ft. Collins on the way up to Poudre Canyon in the front range of the Rockies.  (I’m hoping someone can tell me if they could be from the Rockies). I’m also hoping someone knows something of the process used to make the table.  I want to have the surface buffed out to remove the scratches, but not until I know it won’t ruin it.

So, this marvelous decorative piece is my entry for Accretionary Wedge #42.

:)

Runners up were..

This horrid 70′s? lamp that I just LOVE.

and this 8” tall Alabaster Goblet.  Label states ‘hand carved in Italy’ but is a lovely yellow color that might come from Egypt.  Most gorgeous when it has a candle burning inside.

Thanks for letting me show off my treasures!  I would love to win the prize pack to add to the Family rock collection, but I’ve had so much fun putting together this little post that I’m a winner already!

Viva

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Wednesday Word – Naphtha

January 25, 2012 in Wednesday Word

Last week I introduced the Wednesday Word feature to volcanoclast and began with perhaps the longest word in the English language.  Every week, I’ll dig through my Glossary of Geology for a good geo-word.  Welcome to week 2.

Naphtha: (naph’-tha) An archaic term for liquid petroleum.  It is now used to designate those hydrocarbons of the lowest boiling point (under 250 degrees C) that are liquid at standard conditions, but easily vaporize and become inflammable.  They are used as cleaners and solvents. (Glossary of Geology)

Can I just take a moment to quote Dr. Nick Riviera?  “Inflammable means flammable? What a country!”

This word goes back a long way and, according to our good friend Wikipedia, is “naft” in arabic and “neft” in Hebrew, both meaning petroleum (Probably no connection to NAFTA, but I’ll double-check).  The Second Book of the Macabees uses “naphtha” to refer to a miraculous flammable liquid.  Naphthalene and Napalm also derive from Naphtha.  Naphthas are middle distillates derived from oil refining and are both volatile and flammable (and inflammable!).

Tune in next week.  Got a suggestion for the Wednesday Word?  Let me know in the comments.  And don’t forget your Accretionary Wedge #42 entry and the special geologic prize pack!  Only 6 days left.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

If it’s real, then it’s spectacular – Accretionary Wedge 42 Entry

January 21, 2012 in Accretionary Wedge

This Accretionary Wedge entry if from Bob Chesson who said “The conglomerate (meta sediment) is called green marinacci (sp?)which I believe is from South Africa. Not sure if the name is a ‘trade’ name or the actual formation name. but is definitely cool.”  Obviously, this looks like a conglomerate, but I’m a little suspicious that it may be an engineered stone made up of loose cobbles, artificially cemented together, but I would need to take a closer look.  What do the rest of you think?  Either way, it’s a beautiful stone.   Thanks for sending it in, Bob.  For the rest of you, make sure to get your entries in by the end of the month to be entered to win the special geologic prize pack.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Accretionary Wedge #42 prize pack is now complete – Only 11 more days for entries!

January 20, 2012 in Accretionary Wedge

I got so excited putting together the prize pack for this month’s Accretionary Wedge that I kind of got carried away. I think I’m done for now. The winner will be drawn randomly from all the entries. Remember that to be eligible to win, you must submit your entry before the end of the month. That’s only 11 days away, so get on it! Just post your entry on your own blog (and notify me about it) or send your picture to me and I’ll post it for you.

Here’s what one lucky person will receive:

One volcanic bomb from that I collected from Cerro Chopo, Costa Rica

One piece of mantle peridotite with chromite veins from that I collected from the Santa Elena Peninsula, Costa Rica

One rough diamond cube (3mm) from South Africa

One piece of fresh Pennsylvania anthracite that is oh so shiny and was collected on one of our many local fieldtrips

One vial of ash from the 1980 eruption of Mt. St Helens

One vial of ash from the 640 ka eruption of Yellowstone that I collected in Southern Utah

One piece of garnet amphibolite I collected from the Barton garnet mine where the amphiboles actually outshine the garnets!

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

New Volcanoclast Feature – Wednesday Word

January 18, 2012 in Fieldwork

Clastic Detritus has “What Rocks: This Week’s Best in the Geoblogosphere” and the Friday Field Photo, Eruptions blog has “Vulcan’s View: Eruption News and Volcanoes from Space”, Georneys has the Monday Geology Picture, and Mountain Beltway has the Friday Fold.

What volcanoclast needs is a great blog feature.

Welcome to the Wednesday Word.

In graduate school, I bought the Glossary of Geology (I remember it being less expensive), because geology jargon was keeping me from understanding many of the scientific papers I was assigned to read.  This one book has received more use than perhaps all the others I have on my bookshelf combined.  Each Wednesday, I’ll pick one word and post a definition, so that we can all learn something together.

The first Wednesday Word actually comes from one of my students who was told that it was the longest word in the English language.  Not sure if that’s true, but it’s gotta be in the running.  Here we go.  (Thanks to David Pyle for correcting my misspelling)

pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicicvolcanokoniosis: A lung disease caused by the inhalation of volcanic dust.

Have a suggestion for the next Wednesday Word?  Let me know in the comments.  Also, be sure to send in your Accretionary Wedge by the end of January to be entered to win the special geologic prize pack.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Call for Posts: Accretionary Wedge #42 – Countertop Geology

January 10, 2012 in Accretionary Wedge

Ok, folks.  This is my first time hosting the Accretionary Wedge and I plan on making it memorable.  One lucky entrant (chosen at random) will receive a special geologic prize pack containing one volcanic bomb, one piece of mantle peridotite, one piece of fresh Pennsylvania anthracite, one rough diamond cube, one vial of ash from the 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens, one vial of ash from the 640 ka eruption of Yellowstone collected myself in southern Utah, a piece of garnet amphibolite from the Barton garnet mine where the amphiboles actually steak the show from the garnets, and whatever else I decide to throw in there.  All you have to do is post a wedge entry on your own blog or send it to me and I’ll post it for you.  Either way, you’re automatically entered.

Felsic rock and mafic inclusion with disequilibrium reaction rims.

AW #42 Call for Entries: Countertop Geology

Have you seen a great countertop out there?  Sure, everyone says it’s “granite”, but you know better.  Take a picture, post it on your own blog or send it to me and I’ll post it for you.  Do you think you know what it is or how it was formed?  Feel free to include your own interpretation and I’m sure others will enjoy joining in the discussion.  Ron Schott suggested that we expand the entries by including any decorative stone material that has been separated by humans from it’s source.  This includes buildings, statues, etc.  There’s a lot of really unusual stuff out there, so make sure to find a good one.  The deadline will be the end of January, but I’ll be posting entries as they come in.

A few months ago, I took a picture (above) of a countertop in a New Jersey restaurant and posted it to Twitter (@volcanoclast).  I spend a lot of time examining countertops, stone walls, stone statues, and pretty much any object made of stone and I love that the material has been transported from Who-Knows-Where and is completely detached from any in situ clues to its provenance.  You could be in the NJTransit area of New York’s Penn Station and staring at pink fossiliferous Italian limestone that has no business being there (really, it’s beautiful).

With the proliferation of stone countertops, this topic is open to anyone with a curious mind and thing for rocks.  That’s what makes this such a great topic for the Accretionary Wedge.  Even people who have no idea what they’re looking at, still know a beautiful rock when they see one.  If you’ve never participated in an Accretionary Wedge before, this is your chance.

Anyone can enter, so professors, get your students involved!  Let’s make this this biggest Accretionary Wedge ever!

I’ve got a great countertop in mind for my entry, so stay tuned…

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Fracking and earthquakes: Finally an answer sure to satisfy no one

January 9, 2012 in Fieldwork

The answer is in.  Does fracking cause earthquakes: Sometimes!  According to Christopher “Chuck” Bailey, professor and chairman of the geology department at the College of William & Mary, there is NO WAY that last year’s quake in Virginia that damaged the Washington Monument was related in any way to fracking.  Finally an answer that should satisfy no one.

OF COURSE fracking, or more specifically the reinjection of post fracking fluids into the ground, causes earthquakes.  However, not all earthquakes (almost none) are caused by fracking and most wells (almost all) do not cause earthquakes.  Got it?

For those of you keeping score, that’s yes in Ohio, Britain, and Oklahoma, no on Virginia and basically everywhere else.

From now on, I assume that potential links between fracking and earthquakes will be approached with reason and a measured response.  Glad to have that cleared up.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook